- Joined
- May 22, 2008
- Messages
- 16,049
- Reaction score
- 723
They gave Vermont a pass because they have no city 45,000 or more. What a joke - WV has 2 cities that meet that population requirement and so what is the surprise about the outcome. Several of our 10 largest cities do not have even 20,000 population. Thought some might find this interesting.
http://images.businessweek.com/ss/09/11/1117_best_places_to_raise_kids/1.htm
[h2]Affordable, safe, and family-friendly[/h2]It's time for BusinessWeek's annual ranking of the best places to raise your kids.
As we did last year, we teamed up with OnBoard Informatics, a New York-based provider of real estate analysis, to select one town and two runners-up for each of the 50 states. The selections were limited to towns that have at least 45,000 residents and a median income of between $40,000 and $125,000. Vermont was given a pass on the population restrictions because none of its cities would otherwise have made the cut.
We used the same criteria to rank the towns, but we shifted the weights slightly to come up with what we consider better results. The data we used included school performance, number of schools, household expenditures, crime rates, air quality, job growth, family income, museums, parks, theaters, other amenities, and diversity.
Affordability, safety*, and school test scores were given the greatest weight.
http://images.businessweek.com/ss/09/11/1117_best_places_to_raise_kids/1.htm
[h2]Affordable, safe, and family-friendly[/h2]It's time for BusinessWeek's annual ranking of the best places to raise your kids.
As we did last year, we teamed up with OnBoard Informatics, a New York-based provider of real estate analysis, to select one town and two runners-up for each of the 50 states. The selections were limited to towns that have at least 45,000 residents and a median income of between $40,000 and $125,000. Vermont was given a pass on the population restrictions because none of its cities would otherwise have made the cut.
We used the same criteria to rank the towns, but we shifted the weights slightly to come up with what we consider better results. The data we used included school performance, number of schools, household expenditures, crime rates, air quality, job growth, family income, museums, parks, theaters, other amenities, and diversity.
Affordability, safety*, and school test scores were given the greatest weight.