Arks
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 22, 2010
- Messages
- 6,460
- Reaction score
- 579
As we are on the topic. I just read this article. It has me on the fence now....see it here.
Well I'm sure not on the fence. I disagree with about every point in the article. In fact, I think it's just written by someone who can't build a responsive theme so they're trying to get people to stick with the outdated methods the author CAN manage.EmptyNest said:As we are on the topic. I just read this article. It has me on the fence now....see it here
1. It Defeats User Expectation.
Take blogs as an example. There is a widely accepted "standard" design for blogs - header up top, content to one side, sidebar to the other.
Are they saying having it look on the phone just like it does on the desktop is that important? If so, then NO mobile-optimized site will ever be acceptable, and users will have to scroll horizontally to see those side bars. I think that makes for a much worse mobile user experience than having a responsive theme rearrange things so they're easier to access and read.
2. It Costs More and Takes Longer
$45 for a responsive WP theme is a huge bargain. Cost is definitely not a barrier.
3. Non-Responsive Designs Usually Work
Again, if you're going to make the mobile user work with a site optimized for a desktop screen, that's not a good thing. Yes, you can use a regular website on an iPhone, but all the pinching and spreading and horizontal scrolling is no fun.
4. There is Often No Load Time Benefit
So they're saying that since a responsive theme loads at the same rate as a regular site, you should give up all the benefits of a responsive theme and just use a regular site? Nobody switches to a responsive theme because they are looking for a load time benefit. People switch to responsive because it's responsive!
5. It's a Compromise
Sure, but still a whole lot better than maintaining separate desktop and mobile versions, especially if you're paying someone to maintain them for you.