I thought you already had a responsive site. I am sure yours is isnt' it? On mobile device navigation links are converted to a responsive menu....websites not only have to be responsive, they have to be developed from the ground up with the mobile user in mind.
What will this mean for us? One thing that comes to mind are links needing to be far enough apart that fat fingers won't tap the wrong one.
Photos need to show up OK when shrunk to mobile device width.
Using a table to compare amenities among several rooms probably won't work because the screen isn't wide enough to show all the columns in a readable size.
What else do we need to think about?.
I thought you already had a responsive site. I am sure yours is isnt' it? On mobile device navigation links are converted to a responsive menu....websites not only have to be responsive, they have to be developed from the ground up with the mobile user in mind.
What will this mean for us? One thing that comes to mind are links needing to be far enough apart that fat fingers won't tap the wrong one.
Photos need to show up OK when shrunk to mobile device width.
Using a table to compare amenities among several rooms probably won't work because the screen isn't wide enough to show all the columns in a readable size.
What else do we need to think about?.
.
Yes mine is responsive, but they say "not just responsive, but redesigned from the ground up with mobile in mind". So they're saying being responsive isn't good enough.EmptyNest said:I thought you already had a responsive site. I am sure yours is isnt' it? On mobile device navigation links are converted to a responsive menu.
Part of the problem, even with a responsive site, is the way it is rendered on a small device. All of the sidebars are at the bottom of the page. So you need to be sure your links for reservations are at the top somewhere....websites not only have to be responsive, they have to be developed from the ground up with the mobile user in mind.
What will this mean for us? One thing that comes to mind are links needing to be far enough apart that fat fingers won't tap the wrong one.
Photos need to show up OK when shrunk to mobile device width.
Using a table to compare amenities among several rooms probably won't work because the screen isn't wide enough to show all the columns in a readable size.
What else do we need to think about?.
I saw that in a report I ran last year. Something about links being too close together. In reality, they are not, but if the test program just looks at the code, they seem to be.I thought you already had a responsive site. I am sure yours is isnt' it? On mobile device navigation links are converted to a responsive menu....websites not only have to be responsive, they have to be developed from the ground up with the mobile user in mind.
What will this mean for us? One thing that comes to mind are links needing to be far enough apart that fat fingers won't tap the wrong one.
Photos need to show up OK when shrunk to mobile device width.
Using a table to compare amenities among several rooms probably won't work because the screen isn't wide enough to show all the columns in a readable size.
What else do we need to think about?.
.Yes mine is responsive, but they say "not just responsive, but redesigned from the ground up with mobile in mind". So they're saying being responsive isn't good enough.EmptyNest said:I thought you already had a responsive site. I am sure yours is isnt' it? On mobile device navigation links are converted to a responsive menu.
I wasn't referring to navigation menus, but other buttons, and hyperlinks in text. Need to not have those too close together, if you use them, since fingers can't tap as precisely as a mouse click.
.
Enter your email address to join:
Register today and take advantage of membership benefits.
Enter your email address to join: