With all due respect to my peers on the forum, I do not think I moved the discussion into any direction that might be skirting the line of appropriateness. I offered the suggestion of using reason in addressing the innkeeper's grievance - rule A says the following...the review broke rule A as such...
Politics and religion are big no-nos on forums - I agree. But they're no-nos if in the context of espousing one's political or religious views or engaging in a political or religious debate.
That's not happening here with this discussion. The fact is homosexuality is a topic often mentioned in both contexts of religion and politics, and TripAdvisor says politics and religion are no-nos. Therefore, the innkeeper has a case to be made.
Reason and logic - that's all I'm offering.
Politics and religion are big no-nos on forums - I agree. But they're no-nos if in the context of espousing one's political or religious views or engaging in a political or religious debate.
That's not happening here with this discussion. The fact is homosexuality is a topic often mentioned in both contexts of religion and politics, and TripAdvisor says politics and religion are no-nos. Therefore, the innkeeper has a case to be made.
Reason and logic - that's all I'm offering.